From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 17 18:19:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: java@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBE716A415 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@red56.co.uk) Received: from fanta.soda.co.uk (soda-2.dsl1.easynet.co.uk [212.135.162.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C581B13C455 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@red56.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost.soda.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by fanta.soda.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3293ED5077 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:59:08 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soda.co.uk Received: from fanta.soda.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fanta.soda.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDVQVXBSrmIc for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:59:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (unknown [192.168.1.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fanta.soda.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1034AD4FEE for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:59:04 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <45AE63EC.9020707@red56.co.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:59:08 +0000 From: Tim Diggins User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Port: apache-ant-1.6.5_2 - is anyone working on port for 1.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:19:22 -0000 quick question: is anyone working on port for apache ant 1.7? longer version: I just noticed that apache ant 1.7 is out (as of december, see release notes - http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.apache.org/ant/README.html) with some really useful bugfixes and mini-features (like the resolution of the problem with optional task, library requirements (where to put your jars) and various out-of-memory errors fixed). Is anyone who knows what they're doing (i.e. unlike me) likely to work on / commit a portfile relatively soon? T -- --------------- Tim Diggins http://www.red56.co.uk/people/tim