From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 24 16:18:28 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382C106566C
	for <freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:18:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com
	(mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A4D8FC17
	for <freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:18:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from [192.168.2.161] ([206.210.89.202])
	by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise
	4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:45:45 -0400
X-VirtualServerGroup: Default
X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::22
X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID"
X-Destination-ID: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1qYWlsQEZyZWVCU0Qub3Jn
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; s=noc_cfi_pgh_pa_us_key_dkim; l=606;
	t=1248450345; i=@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:
	In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:
	X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=0Kz434xDmEcY0w722wh/0TSB4
	8c=; b=BVd1s1qDatvvm+ailXKU6K6bnPyb9sbG/J4x0q4LBi32SQbYX2z6p+eii
	SzPVWbhoQMcEqNyYZmYMyGWmRe1H5cBQygFsg5scV9JJdZ6hez++P+YEWlzqeb/k
	xaJFpH9
From: "Brian A. Seklecki" <seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@secnap.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A55055D.8030902@secnap.net>
References: <4A55055D.8030902@secnap.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:03:21 -0400
Message-Id: <1248451401.24024.1262.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ssl accelerator cards and jail?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:18:28 -0000

On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 16:45 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> has anyone done any work with hardware ssl accelerator cards and freebsd?
> 

I'm pretty sure.  Because it is a;; one kernel, the userland->kernel
sysctls just fall through to the host.

I've been meaning to try the VMWare ESXi 4.0 PCI card passthrough
feature.

Let me pass my Sun Crypto 1000 (BCM5921/23) through to a Jailhost
FreeBSD 7.2, then try it within a jail.  Should be quite a head trip.

 ~BAS

> specifically, freebsd 7.1 amd64?
> 
> and, is it transparent in 'jail' so all jailed servers can use the one card?
> 
>