From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Oct 12 18:22:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA04496
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 18:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from dcarmich.pr.mcs.net (dcarmich.pr.mcs.net [204.95.63.202])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA04490
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 18:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from dcarmich@dcarmich.pr.mcs.net)
Received: (from dcarmich@localhost)
	by dcarmich.pr.mcs.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA00293
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:25:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Douglas Carmichael <dcarmich@mcs.com>
Message-Id: <199710130125.UAA00293@dcarmich.pr.mcs.net>
Subject: C2 Trusted FreeBSD?
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:25:29 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Could FreeBSD be made to comply with B1 or C2 trusted system standards FOR REAL (unlike NT that can only comply when not hooked up to a network)?