From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 13 11:16:01 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA16088 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 11:16:01 -0800
Received: from ns.dknet.dk (root@ns.dknet.dk [193.88.44.42]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA16082 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 11:15:56 -0800
Received: from login.dknet.dk by ns.dknet.dk with SMTP id AA03113
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>); Mon, 13 Mar 1995 20:15:40 +0100
Received: by login.dknet.dk (4.1/SMI-4.1DKnet00)
	id AA00422; Mon, 13 Mar 95 20:15:06 +0100
From: sos@login.dknet.dk (S|ren Schmidt)
Message-Id: <9503131915.AA00422@login.dknet.dk>
Subject: Re: linux compat mode?
To: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 95 20:15:04 MET
Cc: hasty@netcom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199503131844.KAA29570@netcom14.netcom.com>; from "Amancio Hasty Jr" at Mar 13, 95 10:44 am
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> >I'll not recommend using the netbsd code, as there are ALOT of
> So I noticed....
> BTW can you implement the linux iopl call?
> It will be cool to run sdoom :)

Oh well, I'll surely have my go at it...

> Also, anyone out there knows how to wire the netbsd v86 call to our 
> kernel. Our locore.s is different than NetBSD and naturally that is
> where the v86 call is wired into the system.

Hmm, er you talking about the vm86 patches that came by on these
lists some week ago ??

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Soren Schmidt  (sos@FreeBSD.org | sos@login.dknet.dk)  FreeBSD Core Team
               So much code to hack -- so little time
..