From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 19 10:38:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCCC106566B; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (mr0.ht-systems.ru [78.110.50.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA228FC19; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from [78.110.49.49] (helo=quasar.ht-systems.ru) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1JbvgY-0003pi-Ei; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:38:18 +0300 Received: by quasar.ht-systems.ru (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 596D57D1C48; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:38:17 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:38:17 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov To: pav@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080319133817.3bfe893f.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1205921932.76695.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200803180100.m2I10QTD070047@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080318193855.0439b197.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20080318181546.GA10903@FreeBSD.org> <1205917353.76695.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080319091859.GA56200@FreeBSD.org> <1205921932.76695.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pietro Cerutti Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:38:21 -0000 On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:18:52 +0100 Pav Lucistnik mentioned: > > Still, the mkdir call may fall, and then the failure is less obvious to > the user/porter. > On the other hand, the porter can always modify the call temporarly to see where the problem resides. > > Oh no more policies, please! > Hmm, am I only one who thinks that we have too few policies for ports? I'd like to see, at least, official policies for PREFIX-cleaness, CFLAGS and file permissions (that is don't copy files using CP) honoring. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE