Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:27:35 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org> To: "Sean C. Farley" <sean-freebsd@farley.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS DOWN Message-ID: <20070512152735.GB28834@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070511182126.U9004@baba.farley.org> References: <20070505213202.GA49925@nagual.pp.ru> <20070505163707.J6670@thor.farley.org> <20070505221125.GA50439@nagual.pp.ru> <20070506091835.A43775@besplex.bde.org> <20070508162458.G6015@baba.farley.org> <20070508222521.GA59534@nagual.pp.ru> <20070509200000.B56490@besplex.bde.org> <20070510184447.H4969@baba.farley.org> <20070511003443.GA6422@nagual.pp.ru> <20070511182126.U9004@baba.farley.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:44:37PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: > No need to worry any longer; I changed them into warnx(). What value > should I give errno? I do not want the program to receive a random > error code. The first warnx() could be EINVAL. The second warnx() > would be a coding error on my part. EDOOFUS would fit. :) I know I > should not use it. EINVAL? IMHO EFAULT. EDOOFUS is not POSIX-allowed errno. EINVAL used primarily for arg checking. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070512152735.GB28834>