From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 8 22:33: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BAA37B66C for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 22:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e995Wvk79454; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:32:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:32:56 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Doug Barton Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Merges in to STABLE branches Message-ID: <20001009073256.A79356@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20001008134028.C69484@lucifer.bart.nl> <39E148B1.A19A6FFE@gorean.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <39E148B1.A19A6FFE@gorean.org>; from DougB@gorean.org on Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 09:25:21PM -0700 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001009 06:30], Doug Barton (DougB@gorean.org) wrote: > Out of curiosity, what specifically were you planning to commit to 2.2? >Unless it's something that is a very high security risk it may be better >to avoid disrupting this branch. In particular you want to be very >careful about disrupting the ability to upgrade to 3.x from >2.2.8-Stable. Nothing fancy, just security gixes I guess. Erhm, while I may make a mistake every now and then, I do test my changes as much as possible. And I have no intention to mess with the upgrade path at all. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message