Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:12:04 -0800 From: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Annoying ARP warning messages. Message-ID: <20021027211204.GD92719@perrin.int.nxad.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210262019480.13443-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <A06F34F8-E94F-11D6-BF1E-003065715DA8@pursued-with.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210262019480.13443-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >>> I have two systems connected through a common network > > >>> (switch). They each have two NICs, with one addressed on one > > >>> IP network and the second on another. IP works fine. My > > >>> problem is that the kernel keeps bitching about seeing the > > >>> same MAC addresses on both interfaces: > > > > > > well, WHY is it seeing the same MA addresses on both interfaces? > > > > Because they're on the same network, as described above. > > Don't get snooty.. > the question is :"why do you want to do that? > Is it to get more bandwidth? I do this to get more bandwidth from NFS sometimes. It's cheesy, but I'll plug two nics into the same VLAN give each nic different IP addresses, then I'll setup DNS round robbin for the A records and *poof* instant clustering. This works better with UDP than it does TCP, but still... I've gotten 150Mbps off of my NFS server by doing that. Can't say as its graceful, but it's certainly a poor-man's way of getting more than 100Mbps of capacity. Julien, know of a better way? I get the feeling that you've got an idea... :) -sc -- Sean Chittenden To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021027211204.GD92719>