From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 3 10:21:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E44C16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0822D43D49 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:21:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040603172149012006cb79e>; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:21:49 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 98F512B; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:21:48 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Arend P. van der Veen" References: <40BF4878.9080506@capital.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 03 Jun 2004 13:21:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <40BF4878.9080506@capital.net> Message-ID: <44pt8gy2tv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports Collection and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:21:50 -0000 "Arend P. van der Veen" writes: > I have been recently testing FreeBSD 5.2.1. I load the initial system > from CD, install and configure cvsup and then download all of the src > and port changes. My supfile is: > > *default host=cvsup2.us.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2 > *default delete use-rel-suffix compress > > src-all > ports-all tag=. > > I then execute: > > cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/sup/supfile > portsdb -Uu > > portsdb returns a lot of warnings about dependency lists. I do not > have this problem under 4.10. > > Does anybosy have any idea what I am doing wrong or is there something > different in the ports collection under 5.X. You don't have the full ports collection. These warnings have been broken lately, but I believe the plan is to fix them and make them fatal (so everyone will have to get the full ports collection if they want to build their own INDEX).