From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sat Jul 2 16:09:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A51B8FC48; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A2112EA8; Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id a66so64632725wme.0; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MH4cRgkbLTXWokF9jS0AJTH+mHR5T95Hz/NaZETFwZg=; b=K+uH4dgmpFNGe1TbNSJL/cJNZAzqvEgT3BIl79rqw0qgoOpjPgkVQHujIdn1Hunn2U dMg9pHTw8AFN/Wsz9Cl3tShKrS6fTplc4Ab+083qcO6FudS2NAzfXbkBfLEmFm9ixRVx Mi3xNSqiG1bsreT+Fsttf4EKSRDzgz7tBypwecKnMEnG2SeS1vF64jknYm6PHfOj73vV UqJBTfo9J+/nbSrytEABhrCtCVucnTTYXebcUlcm3CdqnOljL+AIRjhStrTaDXWHIYTz 6GO67mqE4eXCfAuXOIBbxvpkByWi0h0ptWwNz0RHJDVwElO5iOlS0UfOQ/D6nhR8LVfE nkjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MH4cRgkbLTXWokF9jS0AJTH+mHR5T95Hz/NaZETFwZg=; b=I+0Lq3g88KciAZZDGhVIQ7gf6CfjL7/zLyJZHw76/QtregMBphdVl/uRi5MSBRbJI8 G238zuCuxvjmdtbuvlQ0T8R9H1TaSqYZsFdByMIxh3qhfa6Iw5lCovzKt3g9Uo1R4VTF j+HPASx1wKm9JquBHw+GmHpdpMjI6e1YU3wYQ7jWA6Sq76FKnyLX4W66kYc9oMm+WRBC S8Jn/suAOnUNVrm4yVzKgL5Op7Kn03EOmvT3cUr3aViqsZINrwRe5Oxg5jZl1D0hFHEJ DHbv/rz07LNU21HNhP0iBBVx0kDMeQhCsDjcr/Ki9tLuHF2qTQlFBvYUmu3Q/EZh11d0 Ut9w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJq6Oh9yXGgiU6/4vZPWGkYZIHObYimKWzXBj5FjZJ4Af0yDh9yL4XCMS19Mdnd1A== X-Received: by 10.194.239.232 with SMTP id vv8mr3227618wjc.166.1467475760470; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brick (adeg137.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [79.184.84.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r130sm3983531wmf.20.2016.07.02.09.09.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 18:09:16 +0200 From: Edward Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?Napiera=C5=82a?= To: Alexander Motin Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r302297 - in head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris: common/acl uts/common/fs/zfs uts/common/sys Message-ID: <20160702160916.GA1985@brick> Mail-Followup-To: Alexander Motin , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201606301455.u5UEtnLs090648@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201606301455.u5UEtnLs090648@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:09:22 -0000 On 0630T1455, Alexander Motin wrote: > Author: mav > Date: Thu Jun 30 14:55:49 2016 > New Revision: 302297 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/302297 > > Log: > Revert r299454 and r299448. > > Those changes were found confusing FreeBSD libc ACL code, that doesn't > differentiate ACL for directories and files, and report ACLs for all > directories created after those patches as non-trivial. On the other > side these changes were considered wrong from POSIX and NFSv4 points of > view. Until further investigation done upstream, revert those changes > locally in preparation for FreeBSD 11.0 release. Thanks! But it still doesn't pass the regression tests, due to broken (or at least incompatible) interaction between inheritance and umask.