From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 17:16:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C662106564A for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8EC8FC0C for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB7HII5t022980; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:18:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Ed Schouten In-Reply-To: <20081207170354.GI18652@hoeg.nl> References: <1228667168.69753.16.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20081207170354.GI18652@hoeg.nl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-RuyYTtEspIKH/IiKSty/" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:16:37 -0500 Message-Id: <1228670197.69753.24.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: New VOP to translate vnode to its component name X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:16:44 -0000 --=-RuyYTtEspIKH/IiKSty/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 18:03 +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello Joe, >=20 > * Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > Here is a patch to HEAD, along with a man page, for VOP_CNP. >=20 > Maybe this should be called VOP_COMPONENTNAME? I know, it's not as short > as VOP_CNP, but is probably less cryptic to people who are trying to > figure out how the VFS works. I'm open to a new name, but VOP_COMPONENTNAME does seem a bit unwieldy. What about VOP_VPTONAME (in the same vein as VOP_VPTOFH)? Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-RuyYTtEspIKH/IiKSty/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkk8BPQACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4dcpQCfYPTkbhwr8BBkPVe/PULePXAI T7UAn0Kl3AehlkwEzjmgP2abVCauDtld =P7he -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-RuyYTtEspIKH/IiKSty/--