From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 19:24:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2861065673 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0A08FC0A for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n53JOXNJ024904; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:24:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n53JOXC5024901; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:24:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:24:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Kirk Strauser In-Reply-To: <200906031410.59524.kirk@strauser.com> Message-ID: References: <200906031324.54199.kirk@strauser.com> <200906031410.59524.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Swap on ZFS - still a bad idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:24:38 -0000 > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 01:36:37 pm Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> No idea. You may just make separate partition for swapping and it will >> work. Good if you have swap "just for sure". > > Well, the problem is that I wanted to have a "bare-metal" ZFS system without > any FreeBSD slices or partitions. slices are not needed with any fs. partitions - you need at least boot partition. > >> If your system needs swapping under normal operation, using ZFS is really >> bad idea as it needs lots of memory - which you are already short of. > > It was more of the "just in case", with plenty of RAM for normal operation. > -- so just don't set up swap at all, or do under ZFS as it's "just in case" not normal operation