From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 20:28:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AE7106566B for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96268FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6763 invoked by uid 399); 27 Jan 2011 20:27:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 27 Jan 2011 20:27:44 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D41D52D.2080906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:27:25 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <201101260506.p0Q56Bhf064034@svn.freebsd.org> <20110126173411.P972@besplex.bde.org> <4D408463.4000001@FreeBSD.org> <20110127153956.J1436@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20110127153956.J1436@besplex.bde.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r217871 - head/sbin/mount X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:28:49 -0000 On 01/26/2011 21:24, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Doug Barton wrote: >> My concern was that the man page says that we don't support the option >> at all, but with a FreeBSD client and a solaris server it has a >> demonstrable effect. If someone wants to improve the wording then by >> all means, either make a suggestion or just do it. :) > > What is the effect? Um, the expected one? :) If I use a FreeBSD client to nfs mount something on a solaris system with the noatime option then the access time does not change no matter how many times I access the file. If I then unmount and remount without the noatime option the access time will be modified. If I do the same thing but with a FreeBSD nfs server the access time is modified, with or without the noatime option. Thus I think my change accurately describes the situation, but I'm still open to better wording. hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/