From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 07:49:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7D51065673 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fabien.thomas@netasq.com) Received: from work.netasq.com (gateway.netasq.com [91.212.116.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0198FC08 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by work.netasq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B68C30CA408; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:49:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netasq.com Received: from work.netasq.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (work.netasq.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1VQAp75Nsz0; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:49:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.126]) by work.netasq.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D36330CA404; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:49:25 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Fabien Thomas In-Reply-To: <20100318204746.GA57903@cons.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:49:24 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <197157D2-8580-49E3-B897-5D28EEA4DAF8@netasq.com> References: <20100318204746.GA57903@cons.org> To: Martin Cracauer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Xen with hw virtualization support X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:49:34 -0000 Yes it works but with lower performance level. The image i've linked to the list have both kernel (a basic kernel like = for real HW and a Xen PV kernel). By switching some token in the Xen config file=20 you can switch from one to the other. There is a third mode which i havent personnnaly tested (HVM) that will normally be between the two in term of performance level. Regards, Fabien Le 18 mars 2010 =E0 21:47, Martin Cracauer a =E9crit : > I never got this so I rather ask: >=20 > Xen should run OS kernels unmodified (compared to their native > hardware versions) if you have hardware virtualization support in the > CPU. >=20 > Why doesn't this cover FreeBSD? >=20 > I am missing something here. >=20 > Martin > --=20 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ > FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"