From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 11:57:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2BC37B401 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 11:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0919043FAF for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 11:57:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4FIvZEd098110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 15 May 2003 21:57:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h4FIvZlp098105; Thu, 15 May 2003 21:57:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:57:35 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Message-ID: <20030515185735.GF90765@sunbay.com> References: <20030515145721.GA68695@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g7w8+K/95kPelPD2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOCRYPT / NOSECURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 18:57:47 -0000 --g7w8+K/95kPelPD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 05:32:57PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:20:08PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > I would therefore like to remove NOSECURE, preferably before 5.1. > > Please go ahead. >=20 > See attached patch. >=20 > > > NO_OPENSSL is also a subset of NOCRYPT. There is so little that > > > builds with NO_OPENSSL but not with NOCRYPT that I think it might be > > > worthwhile to deprecate NO_OPENSSL and change the description of > > > NOCRYPT from "will prevent building of crypt versions" to "do not > > > build crypto-related software" > > I'm not so sure about NO_OPENSSL. >=20 > What crypto stuff do we have that doesn't use OpenSSL? As far as I > can determine, there's only ed(1) and bdes(1) (which use libcipher but > should probably use libcrypt instead) and some (but not all) of the > cryptography-related kernel modules (for which there should be a > separate option). >=20 I just recommend that we delay removing NO_OPENSSL after 5.1 is out, as there seem to be some outstanding (minor) issues. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --g7w8+K/95kPelPD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+w+MfUkv4P6juNwoRAieaAJ9Zj4vB4nN1JVbNhPsqxE/K+p+FiACeNCja NW4QSH8hjz+l/Gda+jjD1og= =Lc3l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --g7w8+K/95kPelPD2--