From owner-freebsd-net Wed Apr 3 10:59:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from proton.hexanet.fr (proton.hexanet.fr [81.23.32.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2A637B41E for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hexanet.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proton.hexanet.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g33IxOD05335 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:59:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:59:23 +0200 From: Christophe =?ISO-8859-1?B?UHLpdm90YXV4?= To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: IPFW Max Rule Discrete Number Limit Message-Id: <20020403205923.27d35e11.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> Organization: HEXANET Sarl X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd4.4) X-NCC-RegID: fr.hexanet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi I have reached the 655 firewalling rules limit (with discrete values) in ipfw and I was wondering why ipfw will not let the user select the incremental step value in rules numbering ? also it should be possible to renumber these rules on the fly (though, i agree this is not this useful) -- =============================================================== Christophe Prevotaux Email: c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr HEXANET SARL URL: http://www.hexanet.fr/ Z.A.C Les Charmilles Tel: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 05 3 Allée Thierry Sabine Direct: +33 (0)3 26 79 08 02 BP202 Fax: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 06 51686 Reims Cedex 2 FRANCE HEXANET Network Operation Center =============================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message