From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 14:25:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BB216A41F; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:25:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [69.50.233.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D38C43D46; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:25:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 5A3EA1CE57; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:25:17 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Marc Fonvieille Message-ID: <20050722142517.GA21388@freebsdmall.com> References: <200507191910.j6JJAg6a077939@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050722123418.GE594@gothic.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050722123418.GE594@gothic.blackend.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Cc: Remko Lodder , doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/marketing os-comparison.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:25:17 -0000 On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:34:18PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > Modified files: > > en/marketing os-comparison.sgml > > Log: > > Update the OS Comparison article. > > > > PR: www/82761 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=82761 > > This update disturbs me. By mentioning CERT advisories without an OS > separation gives me the feeling that the document is missing its > objective. Why not just give a link to CERT advisories list then? > The previous "CERT Advisories in 2000 that affected Linux" and "CERT > Advisories in 2000 that affected Windows" parts were an interesting > advocacy argument. I don't think phpBB or Oracle vulns well push people > to use FreeBSD, etc. Yes, I agree that a full list of CERT advisories of the last year is less useful than the several years old breakdown of CERT advisories grouped by affected operating system. Also, surely such information is provided via XML somewhere and so if it was desired it should be automatically syndicated, not copied in to this document manually. - Murray