From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Apr 15 07:22:40 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA07414
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 07:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA07404;
          Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:22:29 GMT
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA23452;
	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:22:28 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA25533;
	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 16:22:28 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <19980415162126.63181@follo.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 16:21:26 +0200
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: syscons.c
References: <199804151212.OAA12483@sos.freebsd.dk> <xzp7m4r6yep.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i
In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3Cxzp7m4r6yep=2Efsf=40hrotti=2Eifi=2Euio=2Eno=3E=3B_from?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?_Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav__on_Wed=2C_Apr_15=2C_1998_a?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?t_02=3A51=3A26PM_+0200?=
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav  wrote:
> Søren Schmidt <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> > In reply to Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav who wrote:
> > > OK, I committed this to the 1.182.2 branch which is what goes into
> > > STABLE unless I am mistaken.
> > What about -current ??
> 
> I'm afraid to touch -current as long as I don't run it myself.

Things should in general go into -current before going into -stable.
Things one is 'afraid of touching' should definately go in -current
first, if the code in -current and -stable is similar - it is much
much much better to break -current than -stable, and -current is the
codebase that will be carried forward - if it is only done in 2.2, it
is likely to disappear when we go 3.0...

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message