Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:13:24 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r340118 - head/audio/lame Message-ID: <20140120211324.00003390@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20140118083539.GC78580@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201401172141.s0HLfCP0096620@svn.freebsd.org> <5844234.U6fZ9grvn7@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> <20140117224229.GA78580@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20140118092757.00003818@unknown> <20140118083539.GC78580@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:35:39 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:27:57AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:42:29 +0100 > > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > > btw here is a patch to cleanup a bit that port: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/lame.diff > > > > [...] > > > > > Strip the binary library (DEVELOPER=yes passes thought stage-qa > > > target which shows that is it not stripped) > > > > We don't do this in all ports, do we? Why doing it here explicitly? > > No we have never done that, and we should we are working on doing it. What about doing it in a generic target between install to the staging area and the packaging/install? Either in an automatic way (strip all ELF binaries, with the possibility to disable completely and to exclude files if needed), or in a similar way to PLIST_FILES / PLIST_DIRS. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140120211324.00003390>