From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jul 27 11:09:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA23380
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 11:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.interramp.com (smtp2.interramp.com [38.8.200.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA23375
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 11:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pp002382.interramp.com by smtp2.interramp.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1.3-PSI-irsmtp)
	id OAA06817; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 14:09:51 -0400
Message-Id: <2.2.16.19960727180840.42378032@pop3.interramp.com>
X-Sender: pp002382@pop3.interramp.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 11:08:40 -0700
To: Ken Marsh <durang@u.washington.edu>, SCHCATS@siu.edu
From: "John W. Rasins" <jrasins@interramp.com>
Subject: Re: 2.1.5-RELEASE and ROOT.FLP?
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

No mistake.  I saw a posting before that said the 2.1.5R eliminated the need
for the root.flp.  You only need to begin with the appropriate boot.flp file.

At 08:29 PM 07/26/1996 -0700, you wrote:
>This can only be a mistake. Try the site again, or go to a mirror site.
>The root.flp file should be there.
>
>Ken Marsh
>
>On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, Nathan Denny wrote:
>
>> The FTP.FREEBSD.ORG/FreeBSD/2.1.5-RELEASE/floppies doesn't have a root.flp
>> is this intentional?  Should there be a root.flp or what?
>>
>> 							Nate:SCHCATS!
>>
>
>