From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 17:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8C216A40A for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C79943D5C for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:25:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.internal (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F53D48331 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.152]) by frontend2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:25:01 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: kz7KA9KoPvhlvfZ1E7xYnQgVIeUcBco6vqObHa9+vhGK 1144862700 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F924ED6 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:25:00 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:25:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604121825.20985.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Help clarify the '-l' option of ls(1). X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:25:34 -0000 On Wednesday 12 April 2006 16:47, David Robillard wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to have an explication about the '-l' (minus L) option of the > ls(1) command. >... > Does anyone know any details about this 'number of links' ??? It's what it says on the tin; it's the number of links to the file. You get one link from the directory you are looking at, one from each hard link; and for a directory, one from the ".." link in each immediate sub-directory.