From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 7 9:52:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEDC15473 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA07998; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 17:48:48 +0200 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id SAA03398; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 18:46:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA24206; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 18:30:40 +0200 (MEST) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id SAA23038; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 18:37:32 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <378382DB.5459E1AC@telspace.alcatel.fr> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 18:39:55 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot Organization: ALCATEL CIT Nanterre X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Knowles Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does vinum actually currently build under 3.2-STABLE? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG YES, vinum builds and works fine under 3.2-S (I'm using it with two IDE drives) TfH Brad Knowles wrote: > > Folks, > > I know a little while back that Poul-Henning Kamp had suggested > some changes to vinum that would get it to compile (in 3.2-STABLE?), > and I've seen some recent traffic on -current to indicate that there > were some other minor problems keeping vinum from building with > FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT. > > The problems with FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT appear to have been cleared > up by Greg committing one additional file to CVS. However, I am not > exactly clear on whether vinum is currently supposed to build > out-of-the-box with 3.2-STABLE, either with the provided code > (apparently dated 5 May) or with the tarball at > (dated 11 > May). > > The reason that I ask is that I've got a new server that I'm > setting up (pretty honkin' w/ a PIII@450Mhz and 1GB RAM), and I've > just benchmarked it with Greg's "rawio" program. > > However, that was with the four IBM Ultrastar 9LZX 10kRPM drives > connected through a DPT SmartRAID IV controller (the drivers still > aren't out yet for the SmartRAID V) with 64MB cache and 128KB stripe > size (automatically selected when the card was configured for maximum > performance). I'd now like to see how this system performs with an > Adaptec 3950U2 and vinum, attached to the same drives. > > Anyway, any answers you can provide would be appreciated. In > particular, since I am not subscribed to the -stable mailing list, I > would appreciate at least being cc'ed on any response you may have > that goes back to the list.\ > > TIA! > > -- > Brad Knowles > > > Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to > take effect. Reboot now? [ OK ] > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message