Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:09 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees Message-ID: <3f2d08b2-2959-dd3e-89e5-895437e44040@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <20210125141051.qheedhp76d2ha6zy@ivaldir.net> References: <3ea16730-84a1-52ce-2251-bdd808fe5c52@pinyon.org> <4990d009-1962-62c2-3f4e-4f62fd03e26d@madpilot.net> <20210125141051.qheedhp76d2ha6zy@ivaldir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/01/2021 15:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 10:23:45PM +0100, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: >> On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> I am completely ignorant here and am looking for up to >>> date advice on how to get poudriere to build and make >>> available package sets from multiple ports trees. I >>> see there is a port "portshaker" that seems to do much >>> of what I want. [...] >> BTW I noticed poudriere performs shallow clones for git repos, so it should >> not use up a lot of disk space. > > Why not using directly overlays, it will simplify everything ;) I don't know if you read me reply or not - I am using poudriere with ports overlay but have a problem with it. Poudriere options does not take overlay in to account so ports options cannot be configured for overlayed ports which do not exist in the base three. Is there a way to fix it / should I file a PR for it? Kind regards Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3f2d08b2-2959-dd3e-89e5-895437e44040>