Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:15:32 -0400
From:      "Scott Ullrich" <sullrich@gmail.com>
To:        "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: enc0 patch for ipsec
Message-ID:  <d5992baf0606160915h33c473b5r4210a232aba4a897@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200606161814.19336.max@love2party.net>
References:  <20060615225312.GB64552@heff.fud.org.nz> <200606161805.06651.max@love2party.net> <d5992baf0606160909q66df7c05wf0cd133196339f03@mail.gmail.com> <200606161814.19336.max@love2party.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/16/06, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote:
> Think tunnel2tunnel or an SA for a local connection, then.  Given, if you are
> root you *might* have other means to obtain that information, but that is why
> we have a switch to turn off bpf, kmem or the like.

Gotcha.  Thanks for clarifying :)

Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d5992baf0606160915h33c473b5r4210a232aba4a897>