From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 22 16:16:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hyperhost.net (hyperhost.net [207.159.132.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09B537B7D7 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 16:16:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patseal@hyperhost.net) Received: from foobar.foobar.eyep.net (postfix@p3.a8.du.radix.net [207.192.132.131]) by hyperhost.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA25571 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 19:16:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by foobar.foobar.eyep.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CF0B137F30; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 19:14:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 19:14:04 -0400 From: Patrick Seal To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: ports/17329 never closed Message-ID: <20000422191404.A25684@hyperhost.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD foobar.foobar.eyep.net 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE Organization: Hyperhost Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ports/17329 was never closed by the committer who committed the patch. Should I just mail the list when this happens or should I send another PR saying ports/***** should be closed? Thanks, -- ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make | really crappy operating systems." Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message