Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Mar 1999 13:01:26 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Roelof Osinga <roelof@eboa.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Have crashed, won't travel
Message-ID:  <19990304130126.B441@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <36DDEFFD.A4DB4978@eboa.com>; from Roelof Osinga on Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 03:29:17AM %2B0100
References:  <36DCB59E.F16D5539@eboa.com> <19990303195632.B441@lemis.com> <36DDBFEB.86D89D20@eboa.com> <19990304095813.I441@lemis.com> <36DDEFFD.A4DB4978@eboa.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday,  4 March 1999 at  3:29:17 +0100, Roelof Osinga wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>> You write:
>>
>>   After both crashes at least one filesystem was reported damaged.
>>
>> What was the message?
>
> Ah, that message. Sorry, I didn't write it down. Hadn't decided yet to
> *not* to re-install again, so why bother.

One reason might be because it's harmless.

> However I am quite new to FreeBSD, maybe these (boot) messages get stored
> and kept for a few revisions like the maillog?

They're in /var/log/messages, and also (just the boot messages) in
/var/run/dmesg.boot.  You can also display the contents of the message
buffer with dmesg, but after the machine's been up for a while it gets
overwritten with other messages.

> Also I hadn't realized expert help would be so readily available to
> analyze such messages. Therefore I wasn't inquiring into that aspect
> of the situation but as to what the effect of a thing like 'make
> world' would be.
>
> If it rebuilds all binaries then I can rest assure that all rebuild
> binaries will be reasonably correct. Because barring very odd source
> mutilations a corrupt source file will fail to compile. That would
> leave the configuration files. But those are mostly textual and
> corruption will normally result in complaints from the program that
> needs it.

The kind of damage done to a file system is usually in the structure
rather than in the individual files.  A make world wouldn't do much to
help there.  In general, if it complains about problems, but still
comes up, it has solved those problems.

> So to my thinking a 'make world' would provide a means to verify
> the correctness of the system. What I am wondering now is how
> correct my thinking is. Remember, I've never 'made world' <g>.

You might find it interesting to try.  It won't solve the (possible)
problem at hand.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990304130126.B441>