From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 11 21:48:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417B31065673; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD218FC0C; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from [172.31.193.10] (cpe-075-177-134-250.nc.res.rr.com [75.177.134.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5BLmRt9016846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:48:28 -0400 (EDT) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 duke.cs.duke.edu n5BLmRt9016846 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cs.duke.edu; s=mail; t=1244756908; bh=I+vbzJvLcU3v6NhEQvikzLiwNoBEhfqRRpejtOcUsak=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vHagwxQTBTTIFppB4F3Ihe+YB6ehbNz0rPiq+bRkjdvXJexHNwFIt3Exa5VmZpVEg cExWV4VncHPMabuPchNDLTVz2B4rvDKQQ73SggzlXH+z7MAuQmw0RAwU17Lv++9tm9 WSFm+yVjndDQI5SrSrZGKzTqF8hrhm8Df4WrBY54= Message-ID: <4A317BA6.3050300@cs.duke.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:48:22 -0400 From: Andrew Gallatin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <20090611180438.G22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20090611180438.G22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD net mailing list , FreeBSD current mailing list , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: INET dependencies in the kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:48:59 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > This is kind of a heads up that from the time 8 will be branched off > and HEAD will be 9 all new code should > 1) have feature parity for INET and INET6 where applicable As a sort of side-note, what about feature parity for INET6 for existing IPV4 features like TSO? Who is working on that? Thanks, Drew