From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 14:19:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9018A1065689 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DC08FC22 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.250.23]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VEKkHu067667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6VEJPjV049663; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:19:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4891C9E4.8060903@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:19:16 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <489084E7.40202@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: valgrind X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:19:27 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > Read http://valgrind.org/info/platforms.html, especially 'Porting Plans'. I had read this, but it dates back to Feb 2007; I just hoped it was obsolete :-( > Or remove the line 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386' from the port Makefile, try it > and see where it breaks. :-) I'm guessing it need some support code in > the OS. That was more my question. There must be some OS support which FreeBSD i386 has and FreeBSD amd64 has not. It was just curiosity, though. bye & Thanks av.