From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 02:32:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C863016A475 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:32:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ender@tog.net) Received: from tog.net (tog.net [216.89.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C2443D7E for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ender@tog.net) Received: by tog.net (Postfix, from userid 96) id A29D629B669; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:32:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-pre4-r208823-terranovanet_v6 (2005-07-01) on spamsmacker.terranova.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.1 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0-pre4-r208823-terranovanet_v6 Received: from [192.168.0.104] (unknown [216.89.225.151]) by tog.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052A29B658 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:32:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42E058BC.9070004@tog.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:23:56 -0400 From: ender User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <42e0044a.3317306b.5585.30fe@mx.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42e0044a.3317306b.5585.30fe@mx.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FW: Adding OpenBSD sudo to the FreeBSD base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:32:31 -0000 Stephen Major wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA512 > >You are correct; I made a mistake on that one. > >Sudo should not be forced upon anyone. >I do not care if sudo is part of the base system >I just 100% disagree with you wanting to replace su with sudo > >Look the other post that came from the dude before is 100% correct this is a >dumb argument. > > > > If sudo offered the opportunity for more features, but by default behaved exactly the same way as su, I would see no disadvantages to replacing su with sudo. Am i missing something?