From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 26 9:23:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from guild.plethora.net (guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C9C37B4EC for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:23:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seebs@guild.plethora.net) Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1]) by guild.plethora.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1QHN6613015 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:23:07 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200102261723.f1QHN6613015@guild.plethora.net> From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:19:01 MST." <15002.36869.925599.285850@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:23:06 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <15002.36869.925599.285850@nomad.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams writes : >Even in this case, there's no way to prove your code is not going to >crash. Sure. But you can at least prove that all crashes are the result of bugs, not merely design "features". From the point of view of proving that a system is designed correctly, memory overcommit is a "bug". ;) -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message