From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Feb 21 16:37:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B4B37B401 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:37:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE3E43FBF for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:37:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1M0ZSRA062518; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:35:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: Ethereal 0.9.7 and Net/UCD-SNMP From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: ajs@labs.mot.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3E56C11C.5060700@labs.mot.com> References: <3E56C11C.5060700@labs.mot.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dmLb0lss8JaHqb6+Df23" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1045874222.74561.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 21 Feb 2003 19:37:02 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,MIME_LONG_LINE_QP,NOSPAM_INC,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --=-dmLb0lss8JaHqb6+Df23 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:15, Aron Silverton wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I had net-snmp (v5) installed via ports and when trying to build=20 > Ethereal, I got complaints about not being able to find the UCD-SNMP=20 > headers. (net-snmp seems to build fine.) I checked other machines and=20 > noticed that they were running the net-snmp4 port which appears to be=20 > the older ucd-snmp. Fine. I uninstalled netsnmp and went to install=20 > net-snmp4/ucd-snmp. That port complains about calls to memset in file=20 > scapi.c. I noticed that there is a PR for that but haven't been able to=20 > find any resolution. I just fixed this. >=20 > Can I: >=20 > Get the Ethereal port to work using net-snmp? Does this usually work?=20 > Should I just copy the include/ucd-snmp directory from another machine=20 > to the one in question? Yes. I submitted diffs to ports@ yesterday that update Ethereal to 0.9.9 and move it over to using net-snmp. I didn't test things with 0.9.7, but if it supports net-snmp, you can change the --with-ucdsnmp configure argument to --with-net-snmp, and it should work. Joe >=20 > or >=20 > Get the net-smmp4 port to build and then I assume Ethereal will build as=20 > well? >=20 > I do want Ethereal with SNMP support and I do need the SNMP port because=20 > I have other tools that rely on them which are now broken. :-( >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Aron --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-dmLb0lss8JaHqb6+Df23 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+VsYub2iPiv4Uz4cRAm5eAJ9icYRSA6jHnmtIq7QhrkxHdSttnACfaVBx 5RpUvx2wXO4kMkC+obDLAbo= =LOVS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dmLb0lss8JaHqb6+Df23-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message