From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 10 05:10:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA19134
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 05:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kremvax.demos.su (kremvax.demos.su [194.87.0.20])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA19097
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 05:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by kremvax.demos.su (8.6.13/D) from 0@sinbin.demos.su [194.87.2.95]
          for <hackers@freebsd.org> with ESMTP id QAA27336; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 16:09:13 +0300
Received: by sinbin.demos.su id QAA29274;
  (8.6.12/D) Mon, 10 Mar 1997 16:08:39 +0300
From: bag@sinbin.demos.su (Alex G. Bulushev)
Message-Id: <199703101308.QAA29274@sinbin.demos.su>
Subject: Q about 100Mb ether cards
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 16:08:38 +0300 (MSK)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

we have:
1. SMC with DEC21140-AC
2. Intel EtherExpress Pro/100

Q1: What about supporting 21140-AC in 2.2-...  if_de.c
Q2: What about full duplex for 1. and 2. cards
Q3: What is the best choice (1. or 2., u recomendations about functionality
    not a price)

   Alex.