From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  4 00:22:43 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 63AAD16A4CE; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 00:22:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C6DD43D4C; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 00:22:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2004020408224101300ldu0oe>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:22:42 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA95490;
	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:22:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1075880955.76993.54.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402040021500.71519-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: MAJOR changes to the ports system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 08:22:43 -0000



On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:

> Sorry for the wide distribution, but it is critical that -CURRENT users
> hear this.  Two _MAJOR_ changes just went in to the ports tree that are
> bound to cause some pain to -CURRENT users.  
> 

I'm glad to hear about this and I wouldn't mind hearing regularly about
major events over in the ports tree.