From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 20 19:43:21 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA662A7;
 Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:43:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from robert.moore@intel.com)
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB8277C;
 Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:43:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19])
 by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2013 12:42:13 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,921,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="349168118"
Received: from orsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.8])
 by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2013 12:42:12 -0700
Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.129]) by
 ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.171]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003;
 Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:42:12 -0700
From: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To: "sbruno@freebsd.org" <sbruno@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings
Thread-Topic: AMT Activation ACPI warnings
Thread-Index: AQHOl7AlA/3MCu3URkWo+1MshxA+U5mehTFwgAB42AD//40mQA==
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:42:12 +0000
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB7C@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1376348029.1469.49.camel@localhost>
 <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB29@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <1377027160.1478.5.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1377027160.1478.5.camel@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:43:21 -0000

It appears to be a vendor thing. However, still in direct violation of the =
ACPI spec.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:33 PM
> To: Moore, Robert
> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings
>=20
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:20 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > We have seen at least one video vendor that uses a Buffer object
> > instead of the ACPI-required package object as the 4th _DSM argument.
> >
> >
>=20
> The T520 has a Nvidia thingy in it.  Is this something we need to deal
> with in the BSD ACPI implementation or is this a vendor thing?
>=20
> Sean