From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 22 00:29:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4263137B401 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from regina.plastikos.com (216-107-106-250.wan.networktel.net [216.107.106.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D91843F93 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:29:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-32-252-88.jan.bellsouth.net [67.32.252.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by regina.plastikos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC436EEB9; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 03:29:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 8999920F8D; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:29:52 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:29:51 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Alex Message-ID: <20030622072951.GA80349@over-yonder.net> References: <20030622071544.94988.qmail@web10409.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030622071544.94988.qmail@web10409.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i-fullermd.1 X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 screen area problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 07:29:57 -0000 On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 12:15:44AM -0700 I heard the voice of Alex, and lo! it spake thus: > It looks like the screen area was set to 640 x 480 when it should be > 1024 x 768, but I'm having trouble figuring out why this is happening. Find the "Modes" line in the "Screen" section. It'll look something like: Modes "640x480" "800x600" "1024x768" It tries the modes in order, so just swap 'em around so the 1024x768 one is first. (Yup, bloody stupid system, that it puts the LOWEST first in the configurator) -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"