Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:52:18 +0200
From:      Martin Hudec <corwin@aeternal.net>
To:        Charles Trevor <ct.lists@qgsltd.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Zabbix Port
Message-ID:  <45161D12.2070900@aeternal.net>
In-Reply-To: <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk>
References:  <8A9C90B0-E258-4ECE-9B0D-67F5020E104A@tca-cable-connector.com>	<20060922155323.710aeb62@localhost> <4513868C.3070403@qgsltd.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Charles,


Charles Trevor wrote:
>   If done this way portupgrade et al shouldnt revert to building the 
> full package, which they seem to if you use a make flag to build the 
> client portion only.

As to avoid this issue of portupgrade not knowing the make flags used 
during first install, there is /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file with 
its MAKE_ARGS section, where you can define this and portupgrade will 
know the make flags to be used during upgrade process.


Martin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45161D12.2070900>