From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 23 11:10:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA09474 for current-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 11:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.247]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA09468 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 11:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from myrtilos.cs.utwente.nl by utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (SMI-8.6/csrelayMX-SVR4_1.2/RBINF) id UAA10931; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 20:07:50 +0100 Received: from curie.cs.utwente.nl by myrtilos.cs.utwente.nl (SMI-8.6/csrelay-Sol1.4/RB) id UAA01255; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 20:07:42 +0100 Received: from localhost by curie.cs.utwente.nl (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id UAA15520; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 20:07:42 +0100 To: gshaffer@nosc.mil (Greg Shaffer) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finger problem going from 2.1R to -current In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Jan 1996 08:22:19 PST." Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 20:07:41 +0100 Message-ID: <15519.822424061@curie.cs.utwente.nl> From: Andras Olah Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 23 Jan 1996 08:22:19 PST, Greg Shaffer wrote: [ problem description deleted] > Forgive me if this sounds like a silly question, but did anybody test T/TCP > between two FreeBSD 2.1R machines? Of course, we did! ;-) If I were you, I'd check the firewall. Maybe for some reason it doesn't allow the TCP segments with the unknown options through. Please, keep me informed about the outcome of your investigation. Andras