From owner-freebsd-sparc Thu Dec 10 18:33:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA28812 for freebsd-sparc-outgoing; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:33:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from yin.vegamuse.org ([206.239.71.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA28807 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:33:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sab@vegamuse.org) Received: from localhost (sab@localhost) by yin.vegamuse.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA19339; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:47:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sab@yin.vegamuse.org) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:47:47 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Kiernan To: Alfred Perlstein cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need some advice about FreeBSD UltraSPARC port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Has anyone here verified egcs111 on sparc64 to produce at correct code? > Or at least used it on a small project and can give an opinion? I've used it at TIS Labs while working on the project I'm currently associated with and it generates code which is correct enough from what I can see. This project produces an LKM for Solaris, JNI interface for the Java GUI we use to administrate the LKM, a dozen or so user-space apps, and a few other things. So I'd say that it works rather well. (We even use STL, so C++ seems cool, also.) -- Stephen J. Kiernan sab@vegamuse.org kiernasj@connix.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message