From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  4 15:21:43 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB576106564A;
	Fri,  4 Mar 2011 15:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru)
Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9648FC17;
	Fri,  4 Mar 2011 15:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru)
	by services.ipt.ru with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD))
	id 1PvWp4-000Eo8-AI; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:21:42 +0300
From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
References: <201103041043.p24AhwQ8023264@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<28478789@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
	<20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
	<58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
	<20110304132825.69583zfq7lvftuio@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
	<92797251@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
	<20110304140351.21353d6cxe89wd44@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:21:41 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20110304140351.21353d6cxe89wd44@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
	(Oliver Lehmann's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:03:51 +0100")
Message-ID: <26703562@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/wmauda Makefile ports/audio/xmp
	Makefile ports/audio/mp3splt-gtk Makefile
	ports/audio/audacious-dumb Makefile ports/multimedia/tunapie
	Makefile ports/multimedia/xfce4-xmms-plugin Makefile
	ports/sysutils/conky ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:21:44 -0000

Hi Oliver,

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:03:51 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote:

> As you correctly state, the dependencies are recorded in packages.
> So the packages which can be installed via pkg_add -r or from an
> installation medium, will have the exact version they are compiled
> with recorded. If they now find another version installed, they
> will print out a warning message. To not confuse other users who
> may not have this deep knowledge, bumping the revision here forces
> the package cluster to rebuild the bumped ports as well and to
> record the new version of audacious in their dependencies. The
> warning message will then no longer exist because now the ports
> are consistent again.

As I can understand the only rationale is to suppress warnings.
And you fully understand the cost of those changes: cluster rebuilds,
all users rebuilds, etc...

So, if those warnings are removed from pkg_add, you won't do
PORTREVISION bumps at similar commits?

While I guess you may do it (bump portrevisions at the circumstances),
The Porters Handbook says: "A rule of thumb is to ask yourself whether a
change committed to a port is something which everyone would benefit
from having..." As for me I definitely don't see here a benefit for
everyone.

-- 
WBR, bsam