From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Aug 15 16:41: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A5737B689; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:41:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA26388; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:41:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:41:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: j mckitrick Cc: Jason Evans , Wes Peters , Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/13644 In-Reply-To: <20000815143351.B37927@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, j mckitrick wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 03:15:56PM -0800, Jason Evans wrote: > | screen (ports/misc/screen) does wonders for the type of work environment > | you're describing in combination with vi. Personally, I'm a hard-core > | emacs user, but xterm/screen/vi is actually an appealing alternative. > | > | Seriously, check screen out. It is *very* worth spending a few hours to > | get used to it. > > How is screen different from using all the vt's in console mode? You don't have to be on the console? Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message