From owner-cvs-etc  Tue Jun 24 22:12:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-etc>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA01286
          for cvs-etc-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jun 1997 22:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.139.171])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA01252;
          Tue, 24 Jun 1997 22:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl104/21/97) with ESMTP id OAA22765; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:08:55 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199706250508.OAA22765@bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: dima@best.net
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp, dima@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:37:11 -0700 (PDT)"
References: <199706250437.VAA15429@burka.rdy.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.54 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:08:53 +0900
Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

    >> > Log:
    >> > sh /etc/rc.local -> . /etc/rc.local
    >> 
    >> > Revision  Changes    Path
    >> > 1.130     +2 -2      src/etc/rc
    >> 
    >> What's the advantage of the latter form over the former one?  I can
    >> only see disadvantage.

     > The advantage is: now variables from /etc/rc.conf{,.local} will be propagated
     > to /etc/rc.local

Damn, I overlooked the space between the period and the slash!  Now I
see what you meant .

Sorry for bothering you.

     Cheers,
Max