From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 14:28:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E191065686; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8248FC15; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5893B990; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:28:13 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:40:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p17; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201208162118.q7GLITsw004962@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201208162118.q7GLITsw004962@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208170940.57990.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:28:13 -0400 (EDT) Cc: linimon@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/170680: [nfs] Multiple NFS Client bug in the FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:28:14 -0000 On Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:18:29 pm linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: Multiple NFS Client bug in the FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE > New Synopsis: [nfs] Multiple NFS Client bug in the FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-fs > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Aug 16 21:17:04 UTC 2012 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Over to maintainer(s). > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170680 As this is a request for a EN it is more of a request for re@ I think. -- John Baldwin