From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 23 5: 5:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3A637BA73; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 05:05:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm002-041.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.80.89]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA06895; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:05:11 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6FF4195D; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:03:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:03:31 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Will Andrews Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-maintainers? Message-ID: <20000623080331.D77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <394CA25D.77A15740@FreeBSD.org> <20000623075752.B77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000623075752.B77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 07:57:52AM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 07:57:52AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Sounds like a good idea, although we should still allow people to opt > out of them - in which case it will be their own fault they didn't know > about massive updates and such. I just had an idea.. what if this list could also include commit messages relating only to ports? Kinda like cvs-all but only for ports? -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message