From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 10 17:43:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C2A106564A; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:43:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200904101343.37355.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acroread 9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:43:48 -0000 On Friday 10 April 2009 03:37 am, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > Hi, > > I was pleasantly surprised to see the print/acroread9 port in the > ports-tree, and since > i have a couple of PDFs that evince doesn't handle entirely the way > it should, i gave the > port a shot on my 8.0-CURRENT system, especially considering the > recent linux_base > overhaul and all. > > The program started up perfectly rendering the first couple of > pages, and then within a > few seconds simply crashed out. A look at the console logs > unfortunately showed the > following message: > > linux: pid 78263 (acroread): syscall inotify_init not implemented > > In contrary to Acroread 8 (which does run properly) it looks like > Acroread 9 actually uses > the Linux inotify system. The port therefore is unfortunately of > not much use as long as > this subsystem of syscalls isn't mapped to its freebsd equivalent. > > I guess it couldn't hurt to mark the port as non-functionial until > this has been resolved, and > opted to put emulation@ on cc on this since i am curious what would > need to be done in > order to get this fixed. To my understanding Linux' inotify system > shares similarities with > FreeBSD's kqueue system and i wonder if a bridge of some sorts > could be established here. It is a known problem: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090401175638.GA31233 Jung-uk Kim