From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:32:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03DC1065676 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC5A8FC1E for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0DJWkSq087427; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:32:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id q0DJWkoe087426; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:32:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:32:46 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120113193246.GB87287@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20120112234424.GA41056@dragon.NUXI.org> <4F1004DB.2030102@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1004DB.2030102@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.99-CURRENT X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem with LOGIN and cron X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:32:47 -0000 On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 02:18:03AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > I haven't fully processed the implications to your proposed change to > rcorder, but a quick meta-note. We should not introduce any new > examples of BEFORE in base rc.d scripts. That knob is useful for > ports/local stuff, but it makes debugging harder. Doug, Thanks for the info. I need to digest the BEFORE vs. LOGIN REQUIRE it a little bit more with my local patch. > It moves cron and jail from right before LOGIN, to fairly late after it. > There are no other changes. On my system specifically: With my change, jail was pushed earlier, not later. I'm pretty sure jail should run before changes the secure level -- especially if one wants securelevel=3. I have no opinion on cron running later than it did before. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)