From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 5 20:12:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt010nb9.san.rr.com [204.210.12.185]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2A7150ED for ; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 20:12:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA86733; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 20:10:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37D3308E.C112F9A0@gorean.org> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 20:10:06 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0904 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Smith Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Nick Hibma , FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing list Subject: Re: request for review: move of /var/cron/log to /var/log/cron.log References: <199909060231.TAA15368@dingo.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Smith wrote: > > > Don't get me wrong, my boss/cow orkers/etc. aren't morons, I would just > > like to avoid gratuitous differences for their own sake. > > "FreeBSD is not Solaris". The differences aren't "gratuitous" because > we're not trying to be "like Solaris" in the first place. The > differences that exist do so because our idea of "sensible" doesn't > agree with Sun's. The real discriminating factor there is that we do > things that seem sensible to our community, while Sun do it however > they please and then force their community to put up with it. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I agree with you. I'm attempting to elucidate the perspective of my coworkers. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message