From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 19:02:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E361E16A4CE for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:02:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail28.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail28.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C4743D1D for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:02:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j3CJ23In022614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:02:04 +1000 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j3CJ237l000307; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:02:03 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)j3CJ22k4000306; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:02:03 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:02:02 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: ALeine Message-ID: <20050412190202.GM89047@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200504121224.j3CCOFXL019177@marlena.vvi.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504121224.j3CCOFXL019177@marlena.vvi.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel killing processes when out of swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:02:18 -0000 On Tue, 2005-Apr-12 05:24:15 -0700, ALeine wrote: > Having a flag to tag processes as vital to prevent them from getting >killed (or to give them lower next-to-be-killed priority so that all non-vital >processes get killed first) when you run out of swap would be a useful feature, >what do you guys think? This has been discussed to death before - look in the archives for 'SIGDANGER' (probably pre-mailman). -- Peter Jeremy