From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 20:10:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD66106568D; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@i.0x5.de) Received: from n.0x5.de (n.0x5.de [217.197.85.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203EE8FC18; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pc5.i.0x5.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 3XGcgQ1Wlpz7yTK; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:10:26 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20120911201026.GA12674@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> References: <20120911161049.GA21635@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <504F6D9C.2040000@FreeBSD.org> <20120911191452.GA48029@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <504F967B.6030108@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <504F967B.6030108@FreeBSD.org> X-Powered-by: FreeBSD X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de X-PGP-Keyid: 887BAE72 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 039E 9433 115F BC5F F88D 4524 5092 45C4 887B AE72 X-PGP-Keys: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/gpg/nicolas_rachinsky.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bug? with zfs, symlinks and extended attributes X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:10:27 -0000 * Andriy Gapon [2012-09-11 22:52 +0300]: > on 11/09/2012 22:14 Nicolas Rachinsky said the following: > > * Andriy Gapon [2012-09-11 19:58 +0300]: > >> on 11/09/2012 19:10 Nicolas Rachinsky said the following: > >>> I can reliable "break" zfs on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 (on two different > >>> machines). > >> > >> Please check if http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240345 may help you. > >> I think that the diff should be applicable to your version. > > > > The patch applies fine, it compiles, but it does not help. > > > > Thanks for your efforts > > In your script do all those "xxx..." actually mean verbatim "xxx..." or are they > just replacements for some scrubbed content? Verbatim "xxx...". There was other content, but replacing that with "xxx..." did not change anything. I did not change the length; when I let every symlink point to "foo", the results changed, and I did not find broken symlinks. Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas