From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 05:08:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7119A16A4CE for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 05:08:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA6A43D31 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 05:08:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-74-195.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.74.195]) i7I58rEU010068; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:08:53 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A3D4513CF; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:08:50 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dennis George Message-ID: <20040818050850.GA435@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040818041406.61362.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040818041406.61362.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PROCFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 05:08:52 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:14:06PM -0700, Dennis George wrote: > Hi all, > =20 > Can I disable PROCFS (through kernel configuration[sysctl/GENERIC] ) in f= reeBSD.... Yes. It's clear from the GENERIC config how to do this (remove the entry)). > If yes then what will the effect of this ??? > =20 > I mean to say that, do we really need the PROCFS ? No, unless you run the one or two applications that require it. > If I disable it will I get any improvement in system performance in term= s of speed ? No. It is better for security on a multi-user system though since procfs has had a lot of security vulnerabilities over time, so there may be more. Kris --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBIuRhWry0BWjoQKURAm6TAJ0eivkk7StHVFzHrRVGSreTEZx6twCfbbZT LpXMEIFT36ekKNnD3kKKFnM= =bGd/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--