From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 05:31:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4671B16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:31:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net (razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C6E43D1D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:31:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from welchsm@earthlink.net) Received: from c-24-118-219-83.mn.client2.attbi.com ([24.118.219.83] helo=NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net)(TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B2sBu-00048d-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:31:38 -0800 Received: from NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2FDUfBB086597; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:30:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from welchsm@localhost.welchsmnet.net) Received: (from welchsm@localhost)i2FDUeje086596; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:30:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from welchsm) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:30:40 -0600 From: Sean Welch To: silby@silby.com Message-ID: <20040315133040.GA86585@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELNK-Trace: 15d86f98c8ef8acad780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b489c14b4db7406708c0037d8fd11a8ac350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VMware 3 changes commited, rtc updated as well X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sean_Welch@alum.wofford.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:31:39 -0000 Thanks for the clarification. I just tried to start two sessions and it appears that the real limitaion is the inability to share vmnet1. I'd sure like to run two networked sessions at the same time... Is that actually possible right now and I'm just missing something? Sean >On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sean Welch wrote: > >> Am I correct in surmising that your changes to allow >> dynamic device numbering are a prelude to introducing >> device cloning? >> >> Sean > >Er, not really. The vmmon device handles multiple sessions fine as >is. :) > >I just did the cleanups because they needed to be done, no reason more. >But yet, cloning the rtc device is definitely one of the next things for >me to work on. > >(After I examine the rtc device more - I've been doing more analysis, and >it turns out that the rtc device may not actually be doing anything >whatsoever. Stay tuned.) > >Mike "Silby" Silbersack